tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1119220018502825338.post5349715916122344359..comments2008-08-05T09:32:16.179-05:00Comments on Daily Desultory: Driver kills dog, sues ownersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1119220018502825338.post-18735416365480694722008-05-09T12:45:00.000-05:002008-05-09T12:45:00.000-05:00Writing objectively is key to being a good journal...Writing objectively is key to being a good journaliat. Who ever wrote this using "added insult to injury" and the lines about how the poor dog had already been rescues twice shows this journalist knows nothing about objectivity or the law. The law is not concerned with the animal's previous health or living conditions. The law is concerned with who is responsible for the damage pets do (it should absolutely be the owners). If a child were to cause tons of damage but then get himself killed, people would surely emphathise with the parents but the invoice for repairs would certainly still be forthcoming. And that child MAY have even had a chance at doing something helpful in the world. A dumb dog deserves no better. Let someone who is obviosuly not affected by their love for stupid dogs write the article next time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com